Recover in COBOL
COBOL doesn’t have a direct equivalent to panic and recover mechanisms as in Go. However, we can demonstrate error handling using the ON EXCEPTION
clause, which is somewhat similar in concept.
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.
PROGRAM-ID. RECOVER-EXAMPLE.
ENVIRONMENT DIVISION.
DATA DIVISION.
WORKING-STORAGE SECTION.
01 WS-ERROR PIC X(50).
PROCEDURE DIVISION.
MAIN-PROCEDURE.
PERFORM HANDLE-ERROR
PERFORM MAY-CAUSE-ERROR
DISPLAY "After MAY-CAUSE-ERROR"
STOP RUN.
HANDLE-ERROR.
DISPLAY "Entering error handling routine."
MAY-CAUSE-ERROR.
DISPLAY "Entering MAY-CAUSE-ERROR."
DIVIDE 1 BY 0
ON SIZE ERROR
MOVE "A problem occurred: Division by zero"
TO WS-ERROR
PERFORM RECOVER-FROM-ERROR
END-DIVIDE.
DISPLAY "This line will not be executed."
RECOVER-FROM-ERROR.
DISPLAY "Recovered. Error:"
DISPLAY WS-ERROR.
In this COBOL program, we simulate the concept of panic and recover using COBOL’s error handling mechanisms.
The HANDLE-ERROR
paragraph is similar to a deferred function in Go. It’s called at the beginning of the MAIN-PROCEDURE
, setting up our error handling routine.
The MAY-CAUSE-ERROR
paragraph is analogous to the mayPanic
function in the Go example. It attempts a division by zero, which will cause an error.
We use the ON SIZE ERROR
clause to catch the division by zero error. This is somewhat similar to how recover
catches a panic in Go.
In the RECOVER-FROM-ERROR
paragraph, we display the error message, similar to how the Go example prints the recovered panic.
To run this COBOL program, you would typically compile it and then execute the resulting binary. The exact commands may vary depending on your COBOL compiler, but it might look something like this:
$ cobc -x recover-example.cob
$ ./recover-example
Entering error handling routine.
Entering MAY-CAUSE-ERROR.
Recovered. Error:
A problem occurred: Division by zero
After MAY-CAUSE-ERROR
Note that unlike in the Go example, the “After MAY-CAUSE-ERROR” message is displayed. This is because COBOL’s error handling allows the program to continue execution after handling an error, whereas Go’s panic mechanism stops the normal flow of the program unless recovered.
While this COBOL example doesn’t provide the exact same behavior as the Go panic/recover mechanism, it demonstrates a similar concept of handling and recovering from errors in COBOL.