Xml in COBOL
Here’s the translation of the XML processing example from Go to COBOL, formatted in Markdown suitable for Hugo:
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION.
PROGRAM-ID. XML-PROCESSING.
ENVIRONMENT DIVISION.
INPUT-OUTPUT SECTION.
FILE-CONTROL.
SELECT XML-FILE ASSIGN TO "plant.xml"
ORGANIZATION IS LINE SEQUENTIAL.
DATA DIVISION.
FILE SECTION.
FD XML-FILE.
01 XML-RECORD PIC X(1000).
WORKING-STORAGE SECTION.
01 WS-EOF PIC A(1).
01 WS-PLANT.
05 WS-ID PIC 9(5).
05 WS-NAME PIC X(50).
05 WS-ORIGIN OCCURS 2 TIMES PIC X(50).
PROCEDURE DIVISION.
MAIN-PROCEDURE.
PERFORM CREATE-XML
PERFORM READ-XML
STOP RUN.
CREATE-XML.
OPEN OUTPUT XML-FILE
MOVE "<?xml version=""1.0"" encoding=""UTF-8""?>"
TO XML-RECORD
WRITE XML-RECORD
MOVE "<plant id=""27"">" TO XML-RECORD
WRITE XML-RECORD
MOVE " <name>Coffee</name>" TO XML-RECORD
WRITE XML-RECORD
MOVE " <origin>Ethiopia</origin>" TO XML-RECORD
WRITE XML-RECORD
MOVE " <origin>Brazil</origin>" TO XML-RECORD
WRITE XML-RECORD
MOVE "</plant>" TO XML-RECORD
WRITE XML-RECORD
CLOSE XML-FILE.
READ-XML.
OPEN INPUT XML-FILE
PERFORM UNTIL WS-EOF = 'Y'
READ XML-FILE
AT END
MOVE 'Y' TO WS-EOF
NOT AT END
DISPLAY XML-RECORD
END-READ
END-PERFORM
CLOSE XML-FILE.
This COBOL program demonstrates basic XML processing, similar to the original example. However, COBOL doesn’t have built-in XML support like Go does, so we’re using a simpler approach of writing and reading XML as text.
The program is divided into two main procedures:
CREATE-XML
: This procedure creates an XML file representing a plant, similar to the original example. It writes each line of XML to a file.READ-XML
: This procedure reads the XML file that was just created and displays its contents.
To run this program:
- Save the code in a file with a
.cob
extension (e.g.,xml-processing.cob
). - Compile the program using a COBOL compiler.
- Run the compiled program.
The output will be the XML content that was written to the file.
Note that this is a very basic implementation of XML processing in COBOL. For more complex XML operations, you might need to use additional libraries or more sophisticated parsing techniques.
Also, COBOL doesn’t have direct equivalents for some of the Go features used in the original example, such as structs with tags or the xml.Unmarshal
function. In a real-world scenario, you might need to use more complex COBOL structures and custom parsing logic to achieve similar functionality.