In Elm, error handling is quite different from imperative languages. Elm uses a type system and pattern matching to handle errors, which eliminates runtime exceptions. Here’s how we can represent similar concepts:
In Elm, we don’t have exceptions or nil values. Instead, we use the Result type to represent operations that might fail. The Result type has two constructors: Ok for success and Err for failure.
We define custom types (Error and TeaError) to represent different error states. This is similar to defining sentinel errors in other languages.
The f and makeTea functions return Result types. We use pattern matching with case expressions to handle these results, which is similar to checking for errors in other languages.
In Elm, there’s no direct equivalent to errors.Is. Instead, we use pattern matching to check for specific error types.
To run this Elm program, you would typically compile it to JavaScript and run it in a browser. The output would be displayed as HTML elements on the page, rather than printed to a console.
This Elm code demonstrates how to handle errors in a functional, strongly-typed language without exceptions or null values. It provides compile-time guarantees that all possible error states are handled.