Recover in Verilog
Verilog doesn’t have direct equivalents for concepts like panic and recover, as it’s a hardware description language primarily used for designing digital circuits. However, we can demonstrate a similar concept using simulation-based error handling and reporting.
In Verilog, we don’t have a direct equivalent to panic and recover. Instead, we use simulation-based error handling. The $error
system task is used to report errors, and we can use the $error_count
and $error_info
system functions to retrieve information about errors that occurred during simulation.
The may_cause_error
task simulates a condition that might cause an error. In our main simulation block (initial
), we call this task inside a fork-join_none
block, which allows the simulation to continue even if an error occurs.
The final
block is similar to a deferred function in other languages. It will execute at the end of the simulation, even if errors have occurred. In this block, we check if any errors have been reported ($error_count != 0
), and if so, we display information about the error.
Unlike languages with exceptions, Verilog will continue executing code after an error unless explicitly halted. This is why the “After may_cause_error()” message will still be displayed.
To run this Verilog code, you would typically use a Verilog simulator. The exact command will depend on your simulator, but it might look something like this:
This example demonstrates how Verilog can handle and report errors in a way that’s somewhat analogous to the panic and recover mechanism in other languages, while still reflecting the unique characteristics of hardware description and simulation.